In January, Franklin Village Trustee Angelina Sulaka sent text messages to residents using a text messaging service from the number 833-215-9844. The message identified the sender as “Angelina Sulaka, Franklin Village Trustee” and asked recipients for input on areas the Village could improve in the future.
Many residents questioned why they were receiving unsolicited messages and whether the Village had authorized or distributed their phone numbers for this purpose.
When asked about the texts, Ms. Sulaka stated that the messages were a scam and were not sent by her. However, residents have raised concerns about whether a highly specific message—clearly identifying her by name and title—would plausibly be a random scam. These circumstances have understandably led to skepticism and questions within the community.
Franklin is a small village where residents communicate frequently with one another. As such, concerns about unusual or unsolicited outreach tend to spread quickly and prompt discussion.
Prior Request for Voter Registration Data
In October, Ms. Sulaka requested voter registration data from Southfield Township Clerk Eileen Harryvan. According to reports, the request was initially denied but later fulfilled after continued follow-up.
Some residents have expressed concern about how voter data may be used and whether appropriate safeguards and transparency were maintained.
History of Concerns Regarding Use of Directory Information
There have also been past concerns involving the use of school directory information.

Angelina Sulaka and David Sahli were misusing information from the West Maple Student Directory to send campaign-related emails to parents in support of Mr. Sahli’s election. Following complaints from parents about unsolicited political emails, the school principal directed them to stop using directory information for that purpose.
Campaign Conduct and Transparency
During Ms. Sulaka’s own candidacy, she did not clearly disclose that she was married to Trustee David Sahli. Questions were raised about campaign outreach methods, including claims about door-to-door engagement and whether directory information was again used to target specific households, particularly young families.
